Search Results

Syntax  is the system of rules that governs how words are arranged to create meaning in a sentence. It is not about spelling or vocabulary — it is about structure . Syntax tells us which word is doing the action, which word is receiving it, and which words are simply along for the ride, adding color and detail. In short, syntax is the grammar beneath the grammar — the invisible skeleton that holds every sentence upright. And once students begin to recognize the patterns, everything changes. Why It Matters for Students When students encounter unfamiliar vocabulary, they often freeze and lose the meaning of a sentence entirely. But if they understand syntax — the architecture of sentences — they have a powerful tool for unlocking meaning even when words are strange. Think of a sentence this way: some words are the meat ; everything else is the mashed potatoes . Both matter, but you build the plate around the meat. The "meat" words are the subject  and the verb . These are the sentence-changers. The subject tells us who or what  the sentence is about. The verb tells us what the subject is or what it is doing . If students can identify those two elements, they can determine the sentence pattern — and from there, deduce which words are modifying which parts. All those modifiers? Mashed potatoes. They enrich everything around them. When students encounter an unfamiliar word, syntax gives them a strategy. If the unknown word is functioning as a subject or verb, they need to stop, think, and if necessary, look it up — because those are the load-bearing words. If the unknown word is a modifier, they can often deduce its meaning from context, or simply move on without losing the sentence's core meaning. That is a skill. That is power. Why It Matters for Teachers None of this works, however, if the teacher doesn't know it first. We would never expect a math teacher to guide students through algebra without understanding equations themselves. Yet ELA teachers are routinely expected to help students navigate complex, sophisticated texts without any formal grounding in sentence structure. That gap is costing students. When teachers understand syntax — when they can look at a sentence and immediately identify its subject, its verb, its phrases and clauses — they become true guides through complexity. They can point to exactly where meaning lives in a sentence. They can show students why  a sentence is difficult, not just that  it is difficult. That distinction transforms confusion into confidence. They then have the ability to walk a struggling reader through a dense paragraph from a science textbook, a Supreme Court opinion, or even a nonsense poem — and help that student find the meaning hiding inside the structure. Syntax knowledge isn't a luxury for English teachers. It is the job. Up for a Nonsensical Challenge? Keep Reading Let's examine an extreme example,  the opening stanza of Lewis Carroll's Jabberwocky ‘Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe; All mimsy were the borogroves, And the mome raths outgrabe. Most of the words here are pure nonsense. Yet students already know the familiar ones: was, and, the, did, in.  That's enough to start solving the puzzle. Read together, this stanza is a compound sentence  built from four independent clauses — four complete thoughts, joined by conjunctions and a semicolon. Watch what happens when students apply their syntax knowledge: "'Twas brillig"  — T’  (subject) + was  (linking verb) + brillig  (predicate adjective describing the subject). We don't know what brillig  means, but we know it's describing the subject — it's a mashed potato word. "The slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe"  — toves  (subject) + did gyre and gimble  (compound intransitive verb — the meat!) + in the wabe  (adverbial prepositional phrase telling us where ) + slithy  (adjective modifying toves ). We don't know what a tove is, but we know it's doing something — gyring and gimbling — somewhere called the wabe. "All mimsy were the borogoves"  — borogoves  (subject — it's the only noun, so it must be) + were  (linking verb) + mimsy  (predicate adjective) + all  (adverb modifying mimsy ). Whatever borogoves are, they are very mimsy indeed. "The mome raths outgrabe"  — raths  (subject) + outgrabe  (intransitive active verb — something definitely happened) + mome  (adjective modifying raths ). The mome raths did something. We feel it, even if we can't define it. Notice: students don't know what a tove  is, or what brillig  means — but they can still identify the subject, name the verb type, and locate every modifier. They can see which words are the meat and which are the mashed potatoes. When teachers have an in-depth knowledge of syntax, they can effectively guide their students to better comprehension skills. When students understand syntax and can see the structure of a sentence, they stop being intimidated by complexity and start enjoying it as a challenge. The good news is that syntax is teachable at any age — and when it's taught well, it sticks. Colors of English  was built on exactly this premise. Using multisensory materials, color-coding, and sentence diagrams, Colors of English gives both students and teachers a concrete, visual system for mastering syntax. Abstract grammatical concepts become tangible when every part of speech has a color, every sentence pattern has a structure, and every clause can be mapped and seen. Color-coding makes word functions visible. Diagrams turn complex sentences into solvable puzzles. And multisensory engagement means the concepts don't just get memorized; they get internalized . Some Useful Tools We Use For some, color coding alone can prove sufficiently helpful. ‘ T was brillig , and   the   slithy   toves   Did   gyre   and gimble   in   the wabe ; All mimsy   were the borogroves , And the mome raths   outgrabe . For others, a diagram serves as a better map for understanding.

Metalinguistics is the analysis, reflection, and use of language as an object to understand a particular subject better.  As parents of elementary students, we would all like to assume that our children’s teachers have sufficient vocabulary and metalinguistic knowledge to teach students what they are supposed to know under state standards. I mean, how hard could it be to only master up to 5th-grade knowledge? It turns out to depend on the subject.  Ask a third-grade math teacher to define 'denominator' – they'll answer instantly. Ask an ELA teacher to define 'phrase’ – watch them struggle. The CCSS demands far less precise grammatical terminology from ELA teachers than mathematical terminology from math teachers; the knowledge gap is deepening our literacy crisis."  Math teachers are required to use more than 100 technical terms, such as quotient, dividend, perpendicular, and circumference. This is not the case in ELA standards, which identify fewer than 40 metalinguistics terms. A majority of ELA teachers are unable to demonstrate mastery of basic terms (e.g., parts of speech), let alone the specific metalinguistic terms needed to discuss sentence-structure concepts. Apart from the subject and verb, no words related to sentence structure are even identified: there is no mention of phrases, clauses, direct objects, indirect objects, expletives, let alone infinitives, participles, and gerunds. Our students deserve teachers who understand the architecture of language as deeply as mathematicians understand numbers. Let's hold ELA instruction to the same professional standards we demand in mathematics." Let’s look at some examples.  You would expect a third-grade math teacher to define and comfortably use the term 'denominator.' Same thing with graphing terms such as slope, plane, and Y-axis. Many of us who have been out of school for a long time will probably remember learning the mnemonic “Please excuse my dear aunt Sally” to help with the order of operations. Math standards require teachers and students not only to learn the necessary metalinguistics but also to understand and apply that knowledge with precision . The introduction to the math section of CCSS emphasizes knowledge and understanding: “There is a world of difference between students who can recall a mnemonic device to expand a product such as (a + b)(x + y) and students who can explain where the mnemonic comes from. The student who can explain the rule understands mathematics and may have a better chance to succeed in a less familiar task, such as expanding (a + b + +c)(x + y)” ( https://www.thecorestandards.org/Math/Intro ). In ELA, if a teacher wants to discuss writing with a student effectively, they should be able to specifically articulate the difference between these two sentences: “During the sunset, the sky was pink.” “After the sun had set completely, the sky was orange.” The first is a simple sentence containing the phrase “after sunset.” The second sentence is a complex sentence that contains the clause “after the sun had completely set.” That’s a tall order if teachers cannot explain the difference between a phrase and a clause. The same is true for the following two sentences. “The birds in the nest ate the food.” and “The birds ate the food in the nest.” If teachers are unable to articulate the difference between adjectival and adverbial phrases clearly, they will likely encounter even more difficulty when tackling the type of clauses in compound and complex sentences. If teachers are not intentional about explaining how structure creates meaning, students won’t become effective writers, nor will they develop the syntactic awareness essential for reading comprehension. Our students deserve teachers who understand the terminology and architecture of the English language as deeply as mathematicians understand the vocabulary related to numbers. Let’s start holding teachers and preparatory programs accountable, ensuring mastery of the metalinguistics of syntax and structure. If we expect math teachers to know "associative property," we should expect ELA teachers to know "subordinate conjunction. Let's hold ELA instructors to the same professional standards we demand in mathematics."

We all know phonics matters, and the ability to decode words is indeed the critical first step towards literacy; however, it is only the first step. Understanding syntax and structure is what unlocks the meaning of the decoded words. Experts note that “syntax and sentence structure concepts, like phonics, should be taught in an explicit and systematic manner” (Moats, 2020). Syntax isn’t optional; it’s foundational. However, to teach syntax well, teachers need strong metalinguistic knowledge—the ability to think about, analyze, and talk about how language works. Why? Because sentence structure directly shapes meaning. Many teachers struggle to explain differences in sentences that look similar but function differently. When teachers can confidently use metalinguistic language, students begin to internalize the nuances needed for deep comprehension. Some Examples that Commonly Trip up Teachers Example A: Active Verbs vs. Passive Verbs Puppies destroy books. Puppies  is the subject . The verb destroy  is transitive   active , and transitive active verbs transfer the action, so book  is the direct object . The book was destroyed by the puppies. Book  is now the subject.  The verb is was destroyed'  is transitive passive , shifting the focus and eliminating a  direct object . These are not minor details. The first sentence might have come from a picture book about cute, young puppies and the havoc they can wreak when left alone. The second sentence might come from a story about an ancient book borrowed from the library that was accidentally left where the puppies could reach it. Teachers often tell students to “avoid the passive voice,” yet many are not equipped to explain what that actually means. Clear graphic organizers can help students visualize the differences in sentence structure.  Example B: Active Verbs vs. Linking Verbs The boy tasted the lemon. Boy  is the subject . The verb   tasted  is a transitive active verb . The boy is “doing” the action, which is then transferred to someone or something. So, in this sentence, lemon is the direct object . The lemon tasted sour.  Lemon  is now the subject.  In this sentence, the verb   tasted  is a linking verb ; there is NO action happening. Rather, the subject’s state of being is described by the  adjective  sour ,  which is called a predicate adjective . These are not minor details either. Many teachers in the early elementary grades simply define a verb as an action word. Yet that definition leaves students confused when they come across linking verbs (which are everywhere in English). In the first sentence, since the subject  “is doing” the action of “tasting”, it is a transitive active verb , making 'lemon' the direct object . In the second example, tasted is still the verb, but there is NO action; the lemon is not doing anything. Rather, it is in the “state of being” sour, which is an adjective describing the lemon. In this case, graphic organizers can also help. Research is clear There is a “clear connection between syntactic comprehension and reading comprehension” (MacKay & Lynch, 2021). So, when teachers focus on metalinguistics, consistently identify subjects, verbs (active, passive, linking), and explain the significance of word order, they help students unlock meaning—and move beyond decoding.

I have always been an incredibly musically-challenged person. Seriously–my husband once told me I didn’t have to sing in church. I always laughed it off and remained self-deprecating about my deficiencies, but when I became a parent, I promised myself that my own children would not face the same fate. At the ripe old age of three, my daughter was enrolled in Suzuki violin lessons. As per the Suzuki methodology, I was right there by her side; she had an adorable mini-violin, and I awkwardly navigated a full-size instrument. I became absolutely fascinated watching my daughter adeptly develop her skills: the lessons were fabulously scaffolded, her teachers used color coding and mnemonics to help lessons sink in, and there was a LOT of individual and group practice. The Suzuki method is mastery-based. Students cannot advance to the next level until they have mastered all the skills previously introduced. Because my daughter was young, her mind and ears quickly adapted to the new language: she was like a sponge. I, on the other hand, was like a drowning rat. I made it to the end of Book 1 with her, and then it was just hopeless; I would only hold her back. She played for twenty more years and continued to thrive. She seemed like a total natural, but beneath that polished exterior lay years of hard work in mastering the foundational aspects. Years later, I gave up practicing law and became an English teacher at an inner-city high school. It was the most challenging and rewarding experience I have ever had. All my students were bright and incredibly motivated, but a vast majority were academically challenged. I quickly realized that my students lacked the basic foundational skills needed to succeed in an academic environment, especially in college. While they could read, write, and speak in English, they were nowhere near the level needed to critically assess authors or to effectively engage in rhetorical discourse. As I struggled with how best to help my students, I found myself reflecting back. I came to appreciate that learning music and learning the English language share several fascinating parallels, particularly relating to the parts of speech, syntax, and sentence structure. Both disciplines require a mastery of foundational building blocks, whether through the intricate arrangement of musical notes or the nuanced expression of spoken and written words. I often reflected back on my daughter’s musical journey (as well as my own humble journey) and took lessons from the way she learned music and applied it to teaching English in my own classroom. Let’s take a closer look at the similarities. Parts of Speech and Musical Notes Parts of Speech: In English, there are eight parts of speech (nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, and interjections). Each word plays a specific role by conveying meaning within a structure, allowing speakers and writers to articulate thoughts clearly and effectively. For instance, nouns identify subjects or objects, verbs express actions or states of being, adjectives provide descriptive detail about nouns, and adverbs modify verbs, adjectives, and other adverbs to give additional context. Mastering the parts of speech allows students to think flexibly and become comfortable knowing that one word can act as various parts of speech. For instance, many assume that "kitchen" is always a noun. In the sentence, “My kitchen is dirty,” kitchen is a noun acting as the subject of the sentence. But in the sentence, “A bird hit my kitchen window,” kitchen acts as an adjective because it modifies the noun window. Musical Elements: Similar to how words form a sentence, notes on a staff make up the content of an arrangement. Once students have mastered the pitches of these notes, they gain the ability to appreciate that notes can be altered beyond their natural state (A, B, C, D, E, F, G). A single note can be made sharp or flat, resulting in a different pitch. Occasionally, one pitch can be represented by two different notes. For instance, both C♯ and D♭ denote the same pitch. Without a strong foundation, students cannot fully appreciate how pitches create melodies, rhythms provide timing and flow, dynamics add intensity and volume, and harmonies enhance the texture of the music. Grasping the basics of these musical elements is vital for effective musical expression, much like how understanding parts of speech is critical to language proficiency skill. Sentence Structure and Syntax vs. Musical Syntax Syntax: Syntax governs how sentences are structured. Understanding how word order impacts meaning is critical. For example, despite having the same five words, the sentence "The cat chased the bird" does not convey the same thing as "The bird chased the cat." Having a solid grasp of syntax and structure enables writers to make informed rhetorical decisions. For example, short, simple sentences strung together often create a sense of speed or anticipation. Whereas compound and complex sentences allow for intricate layering and highlighting details. Think–legal brief. Musical Syntax: In music, the arrangement of notes and rhythms follows specific rules and conventions akin to syntax in language. Notes must be placed correctly on the staff, and the order in which notes are played can alter the mood and message of a composition. For instance, a sequence of ascending notes may evoke feelings of joy or anticipation, while descending notes might convey sadness or resolution. Just as different sentence structures can convey different meanings, various musical forms can evoke different emotional responses and narratives. Musicians, like writers, must have a solid grasp on the fundamental building blocks before they can employ strategies to communicate their musical messages effectively. When I realized my English students were lacking in the foundational building blocks, I brought them all the way back to the very basics and started with the parts of speech. My mantra was mastery: “failure is not an option” (I would show the scene from Apollo 13 with that line). Many of my students really struggled in the journey toward mastery because they didn’t master the basics at an early age when they could have easily absorbed them all. I totally understood because it was similar to my own experience struggling through Book I in violin, while my daughter sailed through it and excelled. To their credit, my students plowed through and succeeded. Average ACT English scores jumped from 18 to 24 without any test preparation. All who wanted to attend college could do so; many went on to attend elite universities, and some even went on to become English majors. I can say with confidence that, without my own musical interlude, I would never have gained the insight that helped me change the trajectory of my students' lives.